I shot just
under 30 images on my first day at Paris Photo and around 100 over a 3-4 hour
period the following day, after I had my ‘direction’ planned as explained in
the previous post. Those numbers include
a few repeats and re-tries here and there, but I have about 100-120 basic
images from which to work. Day two was
more focused, of course, and besides responding to particular opportunities
that arose, I was looking for:
·
Some
images taken outside the event that would set the (‘grand’) scene; that might
indicate the elitist angle; that might position the event as ‘divorced’ from
the ‘real world’ – or make a comparison at least.
·
To
follow up the ‘elitist’ theme inside the event – the VIP Lounge & its grand
staircase; the ‘types’.
·
Possibly
some indications that business was being done/discussed – the market;
·
Book
signings with opportunities for some ‘celebrity shots’ (!);
·
And,
of course, busy photos of activity and movement.
I
implemented most of these to some degree, with varying success; and also added
detail shots, including some ‘price labels’ to indicate the monetary values
being asked; some images to stress the importance given to photobooks in the
event; and naturally a few responses to opportunities for juxtapositions etc.
In
connection with the latter angle, I spent some frustrating minutes trying to
implement what seemed like a good idea at the time – capturing someone’s head
against the white central area of an abstract, colourful image that was
positioned close to the entrance. There
were always too many people around (including an attendant who was discouraging
‘punters’ from brushing against this particular piece and became suspicious of
me ‘lurking’) or I just missed timing it correctly or it wasn’t a very interesting
head ... However, I’ve included some of
the results below – partly because it illustrates how easy it is to waste one’s
time pursuing what would not have been that great a shot anyway, but also
because I think there is a certain something about the shots when they appear
together in this way. Perhaps, chiefly,
there is a testament to the folly of trying to be clever!
However,
over the last week, I’ve had the chance to review my 100+ images and have narrowed
them down, so far, to a long list of 44.
I’m not 100% happy with my handling of the new camera, in truth. I did admit it was a risk. It performs well in the lowish light of an
exhibition-type environment and was, in many ways, ideal for the job. But I was less used to handling it and
sometimes didn’t quite get my settings right.
More importantly, I think I made a few basic technical and handling
errors – even hand movement at times, which is irritating and has been the
reason for discounting some of the images.
However, I do feel that there will be enough workable results from this
44 to deliver a satisfactory result on the assignment. I’ve included that set as a set of contact
sheets. My tutor suggested this approach
after Assignment One, so here goes.
Next step
is to work out how I’m going to handle the submission; how many to submit; and,
of course, which to select from this full set.
They’ve only had some basic processing at this stage, so there will be
more work to do on the selected images anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment